Skip to content

How checkllm Compares

Feature checkllm DeepEval Ragas promptfoo
pytest native Yes Yes No No
Free deterministic checks 33 Limited No Yes
LLM-as-judge metrics 24 14+ 8+ Custom
Multi-provider judges 7 backends OpenAI-focused OpenAI-focused Multiple
Consensus judging 7 strategies No No No
Production guardrails Built-in No No No
Cost estimation Built-in No No No
Auto-detect judge Yes No No No
Fluent chaining check.that() No No No
Plugin system Entry points No No Custom
Runtime overhead Zero (plugin) Framework Framework CLI
Language Python Python Python YAML + JS

When to use checkllm

  • You already use pytest
  • You want free checks that work without API keys
  • You need the same validation in tests and production
  • You want multi-provider judge support
  • You want cost control and estimation

When to consider alternatives

  • DeepEval: If you need their specific evaluation methodology
  • Ragas: If you're deep in the Ragas ecosystem with custom pipelines
  • promptfoo: If you prefer YAML-based configuration over Python code